Why you’re wrong and I’m right about Windows 7 memory usage
Jan/100
(this is the same for Vista too)
DISCLAIMER: THIS IS A HIGHLY OFFENSIVE POST, I WROTE THIS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INSOMNIA AND NATURAL HIGHS THAT FOLLOW. PLEASE TAKE THE OBVIOUSLY VULGAR PARTS WITH TONGUE-IN-CHEEK. IF IT OFFENDS YOU AND SPITES YOU WITH ANGER AGAINST ME, BETTER FUCKING BITE THAT TONGUE OFF BECAUSE I’M ON A ROLL, BITCH.
If there’s one complaint I hear too often and which I’m downright furious about is “Windows memory hogging”. If you’re confident than you’re leaning into the more techy side of things, I would recommend that you do a search engine for this topic because honestly I’m really going to dumb it down just to please the lowest end of the intellectual chain. Still here? Alright dumbass let me spit some insight to your rotting shitbowl of a brain.
Have you ever tried the elliptical cardiovascular trainer? It looks something like this:
![]()
Let me make a quick assumption that cardio is the most boring type of workout possible. No one likes the routine of repeatedly doing the same damn thing in the course of an hour or so, this leads to the conclusion that you want to get to fat burning as fast as you downed your last piece of mud pie. You aim for performance. Recently I realized a “cheat” to the machine, I can opt to let my arms rest in the non-moving bars in the middle for the rest of the workout. Therefore leaving my arms to do nothing; effectively not getting the most out of my time because I got lazy.
Generally, you’d want your computer to be performing at it’s best when you need it to. Let’s set aside green/power saving features as we’re currently focusing on the time you’re actively using it. People have fucked up misconceptions on how memory should be utilized, this is drawn from a very bad imagination that main memory like your secondary memory (hard drives) should avoid being “filled up”. This is only true for the latter as secondary memory often needs defragmenting for optimization. Shit did that bleed you out a bit? I meant don’t porn up your hard drives because the more pious files are finding it more difficult to squeeze in between. Okay fine, just maintain 15-20% free space and run a defragmenter from time to time.
See how I epicly got off topic there? I might end up explaining the whole fucking universe before I get to you, but I am your friend and I understand you’re stupid so I am here to inform!
As I obscenely stated, remove that misconception that main memory should be running as conservatively as your hard drives. Let me visualize it to someone you can relate to… main memory is just like you, or your bestfriend…possibly your mom or dad before they even thought (or lack of) when they conceived you.. YES, main memory is a drug junkie. A different kind of drug junkie. Main memory gets high on electricity, without it… it forgets everything that happened, like a bad hangover except it’s dead. Like a true blue on speed, it can run like a motherfucker too. It can do operations within itself in a fragment of a second.
Let’s say your applications are your heroine, cocaine, marijuana, whateverthefuck.. main memory’s job is to store that for your convenient smoking, snorting or anal insertion needs. So whenever you run anything in your computer, it is passed from the memory it currently is residing on (your hard drives, etc.) to main memory where it is ran by the all great processor.
If it’s still not making sense to you, at this point you should know that main memory is your wrapper, without it.. you can’t smoke your fine shit! Now that you know what it does, let’s go back to the elliptical trainer so you can stop scratching your head on why I had to bring it up. Your resting arms are similar to poor memory utilization. Again, aiming for performance, you should consider doing as much as possible in little time, therefore you INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY. Before Vista, memory is only to be used when an application is running which is pretty logical considering it needs to be in memory to be able to run in the first place.
This poses a problem! Yes it does.
Applying what used to be ‘working’ which is the process of only using memory when it is needed results in a large surplus of memory in today’s computers which are owned by morons who mindlessly add more and more without realizing their operating system isn’t utilizing it at all. This is the exact opposite of the ‘problem’ cited earlier when Windows apparently hogs all your memory.
I realized that I haven’t added anything vulgar for quite a few sentences now… so….. NOOOOOOOOOOO DUMBFUCK YOU GOT IT WRONG, BITCH! I still won’t tell you why Windows using up your memory isn’t a bad thing, no I’ll save it for the end.
First let us grasp the concept of caching. To understand caching, let me tell you about the small, tiny, itty bitty, microscopic memory that’s inside every processor. The level 1 & 2 caches! …moving ahead.. to explain that bit, imagine a library! In the library there is a librarian and in this current era, Harry Potter is still hot stuff. Now normally, the librarian would put the books under fiction as per the Dewey Decimal classification. There’s an exception though as these books are often read and borrowed therefore it only gives more work to the librarian to be pointing out or grabbing the books personally.
THERE IS A SOLUTION! A mini shelf for the librarian. In this case, the librarian is the processor. No matter how fast the librarian may be, if the data to be accessed is far away it would always take some time to retrieve. Therefore with the use of a nearby shelf, the frequently accessed information, in this case the Harry Potter books can be placed where they can easily be retrieved. The shelf is the cache, now is this making any sense to you already? GOOD, you dumbass.
Now back to high level stuff. At this point you should have already grasped the concept of what takes place when you run an application and as recently explained, caching. Let me reiterate: Wiindows XP and lower will only use memory when it needs to, That’s a gray area: It sounds good to you because it removes the intrusion feel that you’re not directly in charge of your computer’s resources.
Now… the question has already been answered if you read up, but Windows using up your memory isn’t a bad thing because of… CACHING TECHNOLOGIES! There’s something called Superfetch that takes note of the applications you use frequently and puts these items into memory automatically! What does that mean? The time spent moving the data from your hard drives to main memory is non-existent!
You might be thinking what happens when you launch an unfamiliar program that the memory could not accommodate … right? Well, that’s easy! Memory is so fast it can wipe all that data in no time. In fact it can wipe it faster than your monitor is able to display the free space. AMAZING!
Actually, all I really needed to tell you was Superfetch, but we both had a good run right?
In summary:
Don’t fucking complain that Windows is a memory hog because you don’t understand the process involved and what’s happening the background. YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND..but now you do. Now you know that it’s a good thing…you can praise the good gods of technology for shining down on Microsoft for implementing such awesome shit so you can be productive, making the most out of your computer!
Oh how I love sounding like I’m paid for this!
How am I organizing more than 10,000 songs?
Dec/093
I’m very particular about is how my music appears in players and devices. I have to get the exact name of the artist, song and other details as they appear standard; just to please myself. It’s a disease.
Having recently gathered more than 100GB of music from all of my computers into a single drive, I’m faced with the cleaning of more than five thousand songs with generic filenames such as “Track1.mp3” and some even left untagged which is even worse. The process of singlehandedly looking up and tagging can take months.
Just so you know how it goes:
1. Look up album on Amazon or do a web search.
2. Find an exact match for my copy of the song.
3. Copy/write song info into ID3 tag, including album art.
One song might take two to three minutes, indie tracks might take longer.. that’s time I just don’t have!
A quick search gave me TidySongs……. simply… one of the most useful software I’ve ever ran into. Through your iTunes playlist, TidySongs looks up each song on Amazon’s music database and suggests details, furthermore, providing a “confidence” level of how close it matches your song against the recommendation.
Add album art – for example you might have a library that doesn’t need polishing but lacks album art, you can opt to do just that without modification of any other details.
Find duplicates – similar to iTune’s Show Duplicates feature but does more as it highlights the songs by appending “DUPLICATE” to the song name or you can set it to automatically remove the song from the iTunes playlist and move the file to the Desktop or a folder of your choice.
Fix your songs – crème de la crème; TidySongs goes through your whole playlist and sorts each song by comparing its existing tag to the Amazon database then recommending additional/changing details.
You might have misspelled songs or artists, missing details such as album name, genre or even track number, TidySongs fills that up!
Organize genres – I have VERY ODD genres in iTunes…. including “Mexico”, “Animal” and my favorite… “Evil”. This lets me rename “Evil” to “Goth”, “Death Metal”, any other existing genre or to a new name.
You have to love how powerful this little app is as it lets you specify which song details can be altered by Fix your songs. Also, the option to undo fixed songs is extremely handy because……
YES, AUTOMATIC! It can sort your music AUTOMATICALLY! If you’re having doubts about the quality of tagging (which it has as well, considering one’s music album can potentially contain eccentric songs)…….
TA-DA! A confidence level ranging from 50-95%. The confidence level is determined by how close a song’s details is against the online databases’. Usually a song which has a title and artist name exactly like the one in the database will have a confidence level of above 90%, so personally I always set it to 95% when auto-fixing so it never confuses songs.
(YES I HAVE THE THEME SONG TO POKEMON)
Personally, the only thing I didn’t like about TidySongs is its use of the Adobe Air runtime environment, understandable as it allows TidySongs to run on Windows and OS X… but from experience (TweetDeck uses over 150MB of RAM!), its such a memory hog. This is a minor annoyance to be honest, nothing that outshines the convenience for using it.
TidySongs makes use of Amazon’s music database, so as the database expands, so does TidySongs’ support of songs. Quality of details is of course, depending on whether the guy that was responsible for that entry had too much or too little time. Currently at 4M, it should cater to most if not all mainstream artists. Not bad, not bad at all!
I HIGHLY RECOMMEND TIDYSONGS, WHETHER YOU’RE A MUSIC LOVER OF 100 SONGS TO 100,000! Get it now, try it on 100 songs! www.tidysongs.com